Friday, August 31, 2007

Nikon Digital Learning Center on Balancing Flash and Ambient

Dave Black, who does some cool things with Nikon speedlights, has an article up on the Nikon Digital Learning Center that is worth a read.

He details three situations, combining flash and ambient. Which, coincidentally, is exactly what we'll be working on starting this week in Lighting 102. So eyes front, you folks sleeping in the back.

Dave takes advantage of Nikon CLS, but I have heard somewhere that it can also be done in manual.

:: Ambient Light and Flash article ::

(Thanks for the tip, Rajiv!)

-30-

Speedlinks - 9/1/07

This weekend, I'll be donating blood to several thousand mosquitoes as we go camping in the Catoctins for Labor Day weekend. So comment moderation may be a little slow until I regain consciousness.

Hopefully, you'll be cruising the speedlinks in a nice, bloodsucker-free environment. With no bears, either.


• Andrew over at Meejahor.com has a neat little trick for nailing focus on self-portraits.

• Gregg Vizney has a set of photos detailing a Pocket Wizard light stand bracket here. Or, if you are too lazy to make one, he'll sell you one here.

• If you are having trouble finding black straws to make a DIY grid spot, Moishe over at MPEX is now selling a DIY kit that includes the straws and a few other cool goodies.

• And finally, a cool story about a man, a train station and a whole lotta gaffer's tape. (Thanks, Mike!)

-30-

Introducing Connected Flow

If you are a Mac user check out our newest site sponsor, Connected Flow. They make inexpensive plug-ins for easily batch exporting photos between platforms such as iPhoto, Aperture and Flickr. And if you plug in the code, "STROBIST1," you get 10% off.

Welcome aboard, guys!

-30-

Thursday, August 30, 2007

DIY Darwin Award


All good Strobists go to heaven. Some, perhaps, sooner than others.

If you happen to have an unneeded engineer's lamp and maybe some extra life expectancy lying around, you may wish to consider this DIY slaved desk-lamp flash.

With it's sexy, open, all-metal design, you're sure to shock your friends and neighbors with your lighting prowess. Yessiree, this baby plugs right into the wall (230 volts AC) eliminating the need for those expensive, potentially life-sparing AA's.

Just perfect for that added depth-of-field you need when photographing small, inquisitive children as they run around your studio.

(Thanks to tarjei99 for the tip. And for the love of Pete, please do not build one of these things.)

-30-

Chase Jarvis Behind the Scenes


So, what's it really like to go out on a shoot with Chase Jarvis?

Oh, just the usual: Throwing stuff at his models, driving around without seatbelts, fun with dead animal parts and tracking the elusive, uh, "weeping willow."

Sort of.

That said, this one showed me more about the guy's lighting technique than any of the others. I like the car-to-car Lumy thing.

-30-

SB-24: Monster Garage Edition

I had a chance to talk to Vadim V. during a lunch break at one of the Seattle seminars. And he showed me his way-cool, bare-bulb-modified SB-24 flash. As if I wasn't drooling enough waiting for lunch already.

He has thrown a photo of it up on Flickr, and you are gonna drool too when you start thinking about what you could do with this. (An early mentor of mine, John Falk, knew a guy who modified 283's this way back in the day.)

The mod was a little more complicated than I imagined, due to an optical feedback circuit near the flash tube. (Vadim works for Microsoft and apparently has an oversized brain.) But how sweet is that flash?

If we are lucky, maybe he will answer questions via his Flickr photo page and some of the solder jockeys among you can make one, too.

Just remember not to lick that 350v capacitor.

-30-

Sunday, Sept 9th, Mystery Event in Columbia, MD

UPDATE: The Sept. 9th event has been filled. If you created a comment and submitted it before the comments function closed for this post, your comment has been received. Emails with relevant info went out on Friday afternoon.

-30-

Chips, Glass and Light: Assembling an Inexpensive Camera Bag

As a newspaper photojournalist, my gear considerations were based on reliability, speed (both motor and lens) durability and image quality. My bodies were top of the line. My glass was fast, heavy, prime and expensive. I had both a daily working bag and a pool room full of specialized gear.

For the first time in twenty years, I have been buying a bag full of camera gear out of my own pocket. And while I am fortunate enough to be able to afford pretty much whatever gear bag that I decide I need, I am also re-examining every assumption I have had about gear over the last 20 years. And the results have been very surprising to me.

(More after the jump.)

Sure, it's a head trip to be the first guy on the sidelines of an NFL game to be toting around a D3. There's a pecking order to it. And don't think photographers don't notice who has what and when.

But sports is a much smaller part of my shooting equation now, and that alone radically changes your resource allocation. My priorities have changed. And the dollars being spent are my own. So I decided to put together a bag as if I were just starting out, albeit with 20+ years' shooting experience this time. Which is pretty much exactly what is happening, in a sense.

I am pretty well stocked with light (I have always maintained a personal lighting bag.) But for the sake of argument, let's integrate the lighting facet into the gear choices in the hopes that it may be useful to those of you who are buying gear without the benefit of 20 years of daily shooting.

What follows are my choices. You may be surprised at them. I know I was. I would be curious to know your version of a starter bag -- and why -- and where it would cost out. Gear is not cheap, and we have many, many readers of this site who could benefit from your experience when choosing cameras, lenses and flashes.

To be clear, I am a Nikon Guy. So you will have to interpolate for Canon. Or better yet, leave your choices in the comments.

Second, note the increased importance of light in the gear selection. No surprise there. But nothing -- nothing -- gives you the photo quality bang for the buck as does light. That is the biggest difference between how I think now and how I thought 20 years ago.


Starter Bag, Poised for Growth: $1,286.


Camera: Nikon D70s -- $500.00

I was surprised by this one myself. This is not even a current model. Nikon sometimes sells them refurbished, and they are all over eBay. Look for them on the cheap each time Nikon introduces a new model in the amateur digicam range.

Why? It is an amazing camera for the money. Sure, 6.1 megapixels is not a lot of dots. But they are pretty good dots. And 3,000+ dots on the long side is all most people really need. Besides, using light well makes your camera's output look so much better.

And the D70s is a serious flash shooter's camera. Its on-board winky flash is also is CLS commander-enabled, allowing it to wirelessly control a CLS flash in TTL, Auto or Manual mode.

Sync speed is nominally 1/500th of a second. Your flash just got twice as powerful as those cameras which sync at 1/250th. But the goodness does not stop there. You can sync at almost any speed if the D70s does not know it is controlling a flash. That makes this camera a no-brainer for a budget-conscious Nikon flash shooter.

The current model Nikon D40 (but not the D40x) has the flash sync hack, too. But it does not do built-in CLS. And CLS is what is going to be your starter wireless sync.

Neither the D70s or the D40 is a heavy-use camera. But the idea is to start with this, and move it to your #2 body when you go to a D200 or D300 as a heavier use primary camera.


Glass: Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 -- $400.00

Even more surprised at this one. Back in the day, we used to laugh at people who coughed up for the high-end Nikons and stuck third-party zooms on them. Cameras were black boxes and glass made your photos. And third-party zoom glass suc was not a good recipe for success.

Times have changed. Now, the black box very much matters. There is a lot going on in there. And lens designers have gotten better and better.

I learned about the Tamron 17-50/2.8 XR Di-II SP from a long-time photographer for whom I have a tremendous amount of respect. It is sharp. It is light. It is small. It is cheap. This particular shooter has ditched his D2's and D200's and now travels with three D80's, the Tamron 17-50, a Sigma 50-150/2.8 (will the heresies never cease?) and a pair of SB-800's.

The D80's are tiny, with great chips. He carries three, just in case. I suspect the third one stays in the hotel room. (He's never had a problem with the "A" or "B" camera.) But his daily walking bag has two bodies, 17mm-150mm range at f/2.8 all the way through, and sophisticated, multi-light capability. All for almost no weight, and working out of a small waist pack.

Back to the Tamron 17-50/2.8, I find it sharp enough to use at f/2.8 (and it stays at f/2.8 all the way through.) Stop it down and it gets better still. It is light as a feather, yet still solid. And the equivalent film range is 28-75mm. Focuses nice and close, too.

Downside: It is for APS-sized sensor camera. No can do on a Canon 5D. But they do make it in a Canon mount for the small-chip cameras. And note that the prices of these lenses have been fluctuating daily over the past couple of weeks.


Flash: Nikon SB-800 -- $320.00

Look, I told you everything was on the table, assumption-wise. But Nikon's most expensive flash for a starter bag? It'll make more sense as we look at the expansion/upgrade path at the end.

Consider the possibilities that an SB-800 yields: CLS and wireless flash, right off of the mark. At a 1/500th sync with a D70s. But the very first upgrade I would get would be a PC cord (and hot shoe/PC adapter) because that gets me the ability to sync at almost any speed on a D70s.

Besides, the SB-800 has that built-in superslave, which makes it an ideal second light later. At $320, it almost kills off the budget. But that's okay, because everything from here is cheap.


Off-Brand Light Stand -- $25

Where possible, we are pinching pennies. And stands are a good place to squeeze the budget. Example: This Interfit 8-foot stand is less than half the cost of the more compact Bogen 3373. While I love the portability of the latter, choosing the former scrapes me some money to put toward a PC cord and all that high-end flash sync if I am starting out.


Umbrella Stand Adapter -- $15

Again, the ancillary lighting gear is so cheap, relative to the camera and flash. The bang or buck you can get -- once you have the abilility to get the light off of the camera -- is amazing. You can spend more for heavier duty versions, but this one has served me well for $15.


White, Shoot-Through Umbrella -- $26.00

The convertible version is worth the extra few dollars. It gives you versatility and the ability to control your spill with that back cover. Again, cheap.


Now, The Growth Part

Looking forward, my plans would include the following, in order:

• PC cord setup, to get high sync capability. Cheap.

• A reasonably priced 70-200-ish zoom. Again, if you are using light well, your photo quality is less dependent on exotic glass.

• A second light and Pocket Wizards. My choice would be an SB-26. Again, many possibilities now. PW the '26 and slave the '800. Or go with a quick, run-and-gun SB-800 in CLS mode. PC jacks on both flashes ensure easy sync in a variety of ways.

• Second body: D200 or D300. This becomes your primary camera, saving the mileage on the D70s for when you need the high-speed sync. But it is worth noting that you can get the whole starter setup for less than the price of a lensless D200 body alone.


I was very surprised by my choices after I set aside all of my assumptions and photojournalist biases. But I am out the door for a reasonable amount of cash. I can travel light, I can make cool light. And I haven't boxed myself for expansion. Heck, my daily PJ bag (pictured up top) cost over $10,000.00. But it is also designed to crank out 500 shots a day, every day. There is no need to pay for that kind of duty cycle if you do not need it.

And again, light gets a much higher priority when you have been doing this for a while. When I was green, it was all about saving for a 300/2.8. Yikes, think of the pictures you could make with that kind of money, put toward a well-chosen bag.

Have you gone through a similar decision-making process, or do you just buy gear when the bug hits you? Are you going through the process right now? Stick your choices -- and briefly why -- in the comments. You'll be helping someone a few steps behind you in the process.

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Free Download: Simply Well Lit with Joe McNally

I was hanging out in Penn Camera (my local photo store/pro shop) last week when I came across a very cool promotional brochure put out by the folks at Bogen Imaging. It's a 24-page, oversized, heavy stock Elinchrom brochure wrapped around a photo shoot by Joe McNally.

I am a big fan of Joe McNally. If he did a video on how to make toast, I would probably watch it. But a brochure illustrating many different types of light on a gorgeous Kazakh model?

Yeah, I'm there. (More after the jump.)
__________________________


A Sampling of Quotes:


On restricting light:

"... If you want something to look interesting, don't light all of it. ..."

On the ubiquity of the ring light:

"... It actually has gotten a bit of a bad rap, probably from overuse in those downtown magazines with catchy names that usually last for about two issues and run page after page of disaffected, outlandishly dressed young people, apparently high on some form of illegal substance, staring vacantly at the camera with a circular highlight in their overlarge pupils. ..."

And, needing no qualification or justification whatsoever:

"... When I explained the concept to the model, she queried me in her rich Kazakh accent, 'So I will be nude, yes?' ..."

(Okay, am I the only one who could actually hear that being said, out loud, in my head?)

______________________

Fortunately, we live in a world where, if you create a brochure like this, it almost certainly gets converted to a .pdf and stuck on a site somewhere. You can download the brochure here. (Right click it to download to your computer.)

If you want to see for yourself Joe McNally shooting glorious Kazakh model with Elinchrom lights for glory of Kazakhstan on niiiice paper, shoot Bogen Imaging an email and request a copy.

Stick something like "Request for Simply Lit Brochure seen on Strobist" in the header, to make sure your email will be seen by the poor person whose job it will be to address brochures for the next few days. (And don't forget to give them your snail mail address.)

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

It's That Time of Year: Football Preview Shots


Mark Cornelison, a shooter for the Lexington Herald (in Kentucky in the US) has posted a video on shooting football preview portraits. Good stuff. Reminds me of my former Patuxent Publishing colleague Fran Gardler's work. (He occasionally shoots with the Speed Graphic, too.)

I love the multi-angle, hard light look. And as a bonus, you can totally do this with speedlights as there are no light softeners to eat up your watt-seconds.

:: More Work by Cornelison ::
:: Francis Gardler's Spring 2006 Athletes ::

(Thanks for the heads-up in the comments, Jonathan.)

-30-

Monday, August 27, 2007

Lighting 102: Specular Background Assignment | Discussion

Results from two weeks ago, in which you were asked to shoot a portrait using an umbrella to both light your subject and create a specular highlight on the background, as in this example.

From the final edits, it is clear that this was a bit of a polarizing experience. You either got it or you didn't. It was either a natural extension of the experiments in the kitchen, or it was a maddening exercise in geometric futility.

The trick: Stay close to the umbrella and don't push that angle too much because everything is doubled. Also, maybe find your specular reflection first and then just stick your person in front of it. As always, click the pic for more info, or to leave props to the specific photographer.

The takeaway from this technique-based assignment is that one small light can be stretched to create a nuanced, three-dimensional portrait if you keep your eye out for a background with the right tone and surface quality.

Leading off above is a self-portrait by h_oudini, who used his armoire as a reflective surface. He took care of the crack between the two doors by applying a frontal lobotomy crop to himself. This is always a great solution for hiding an imperfection, whether the offending area be in the background or on top of your subject's head.

The surface quality of the background in this shot, courtesy Scott Campbell, is not as reflective as some of the others. This background results in a softer highlight being thrown back at you. It's more subtle and muted.

The expression is this photo is a nice bonus, too.

Since you can choose to include a specular highlight or not in these situations, you now have the ability to get two different tones out of any one dark, reflective background. If you are shooting in a fixed location (like a studio) just think of the range of background colors and tones you could have at your beck and call be keeping a collection of 4x6-foot pieces of cheap countertop laminate laying around. Seriously, this stuff is not that expensive.

Remember: After you nail the lighting technique, you still have to include some personality in the photo.

Which is exactly what itsjustanalias did. If you don't believe me, check out this composite from the shoot. If you want to keep a model happily sitting for you, it is hard to go wrong with pie.

Most of the entries were horizontals. But this technique lends itself well to verticals. And those can be done with a much smaller piece of real estate for the background.

This is a great trick to pull out when you need a potential cover in a pinch. And aigi is a cowboy killer (love those aliases, folks) came in tight and vertical for a more pensive version for his effort.

Once you get that background highlight lined up, move in. Hit some tight crops. Play around with the internal geometry of your shot.

Finally is this rather ingenious solution, which a few of you figured out. Can't find a good specular highlight background? Maybe you are looking in the wrong dimension.

No, not the Twilight Zone. It's just that maybe you were concentrating too much on vertical surfaces as backdrops. How many of you have a coffee table (or some other kind of table) which would have worked, turned on it's side?

That's what Danny Kino did. Nice thinkin' there, Danny.

Actually, one of the other shots pictured here used that same technique. Can you spot it?
_______________________

So, them's the shots for the specular background portraits. See them all here, and the selects here. Group discussion is here.

As for the ones on this page: Nice, simple elegant, tonally rich photos, all. It's just a neat look, and I hope you feel comfy trotting it out the next time you want to do more with less.

But for now, better rest up, get some exercise and eat your Wheaties before next week. Because that is when we jump back into the lighting controls. Next is light balancing, maybe the most complex -- and most useful -- of all of the lighting controls.


NEXT: Balancing Flash at Twilight

Florida Strobists, Throwin' Down







Well, peoples, the bar has been set pretty high right out of the blocks. The Florida Strobist meet-up, organized by Nick Haskins, apparently shot a little video.

I know that there are several other meet-ups in the works. And I am sure you guys will have fun and stuff. But the Florida contingent is totally owning right now.

Maybe the West Coast leftie-creative types will represent with something to top this. But I wouldn't bet on it.

(Via NicholausHaskins.com.)

Interest/Venue Check: Paris Seminar

I will be in Paris with my family for the last week in October. If I can find a suitable venue, we could definitely do a full-day seminar on Saturday, Oct. 27th. I have someone in Paris helping me look, but I am very open to your ideas for a venue.
Eiffel Tower photo by Strobist reader Electroic Alchemist.

(Specifics after the jump.)

1. Needs to be big enough to hold about 50 people. (We do not have that many, but we need working room in addition to seating room.

2. Needs to be near food, so we can get lunch. In Paris, I do not see this as being a major problem.

3. I am happy to hear any suggestions you may have, and especially if you have access to a room via school or a studio, etc. I am happy to pay you for use of your facilities.

Please hit us with any ideas in the comments. If I go with your suggestion, (first mention in case of multiple suggesters) your seat is free.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Reader Question: Karate Kids

Reader Joseph S. will be photographing kids sparring against each other in this room at a karate studio. He posted a question on the Flickr threads looking for advice from other readers on how to design the lighting.

I want to think through this one out loud and walk through what I would do and why. But first, take a moment to think how you might approach this shot.

Hint: The first problem you'll need to solve has absolutely nothing to do with light. Solutions (mine, at least) after the jump.


First, The Bad News

Problem number one: How to keep the little guys from accidentally destroying your lighting gear.

Problem number two: How to light the room to where they can move around and still be in good, consistent light.

Problem number three: How to get the light over the heads of the other spectators, and have your stands out of their way, too.


Now, The Good News

The first thing that jumps out at me in this room is that red wall. Sweet. That's a ready-made backdrop, as far as I am concerned.

I will definitely want to use that if I possibly can. In fact, I will choose my shooting height and direction based on keeping that wall as a full backdrop if possible. That means compromising best I can between wideangle (for full body shots up close) and long lens (to keep the wall filling the frame as much as practical) as I shoot.

I'll be shooting along the room divider area opposite the red wall. I will likely be moving left and right as I shoot, staying low, so I am always shooting on a line perpendicular to the red wall. That will keep my red backdrop as large as possible. (Shooting on the angle makes it shrink with distance because of angular perspective.)

The main thing I want to do up top is not to let the ceiling line creep into the photo. So I shoot from an angle as low as possible, and zoom in until the two people just fill the frame. So my first choice would be a wide-to-short-tele zoom for this session.

Also, as far as the background is concerned, is anyone else seeing the possibilities for some cool, specular background portrait shots? Even action portraits. Nice.

Other good news: We have a white, low ceiling. That is going to solve our height issues very easily.

So let's look at three lighting possibilities, each related and each very easy to change to one of the other two options at a moment's notice.

Joseph said he will be using Vivitary 283's and Pocket Wizards. All three of my choices use two speedlights (more powerful lights if you can get your hands on them, or ganged speedlights if you have four flashes) aimed up into the ceilings near room corners.

The ambient exposure in the room is reported to be 1/80 at ASA 400. That means at ASA 400, shooting at 1/250th at f/2.8 is going to underexpose the ambient-lit portion of the shot by 1.7 stops. Perfect. We will shoot at 1/250th at f/2.8 at ASA 400 and try to light the sparring area to f/2.8 at ASA 400.

If you are going to use the ambient as a component of the exposure, you'll have to green your flashes. Then you set your camera to fluorescent white balance and everything reverts to white. Or close to it, at least.

So, here is my thinking, in order from safest to edgy.


Option Number One: Safe Light

The easiest lighting technique of the three is to put a strobe in each corner, behind me (but mostly to the side of me as the room is long and thin) to the left and right. This will give even light that is somewhere between frontal 45's and side-light.

You cannot hide from this light, and everything will look good. The light will be very even across a large area in the center of the room. As they move away from center, one light becomes main and the other becomes fill. Lots of room for error in this setup. As they get very close to the ends of the room, it'll brighten up a little. Test this out beforehand, and know at roughly what point on each side you need to move to f/4.

If that sounds hard, it's not. Try it.

As for power, I would put the greened flashes on 1/2 power and point them up at the ceiling at either a 50mm or 35mm beam spread. Do not point them straight up, or the colored walls will catch some light and color your light in a bad way. Aim them a little out into the room. But not so much that the kids catch any raw light.

(I am assuming he has VP-1 modules on the 283's, which allow a Vivitar 283 to go manual power, since he typically lights with these flashes. If not, choose the yellow auto setting. It is the closest to what you need, aperture-wise, and it should be consistent as the flashes are seeing the same scene all of the time.)

Set up your lights and shoot your hand in front of your face as you walk around the room to test various areas, like this.

I start with 1/2 power as it gives me a better recycle time than full power. If you can get f/2.8 at half power, you're fine. If it is brighter than that, power down your flashes until you get an f/2.8 reading in the center of the room. This will buy you some shorter recycle time.

If the lights are not bright enough, I would bump up to ASA 800. Don't worry - ASA 800, lit, looks way better than you'd expect. If you still cannot get ASA 800 at 1/2 power, go to full power and wait out your recycle. Good (NiMH) rechargeables will help you out there, giving you a 3.5-to-4-second recycle time on full power.

If you cannot get ASA 800-f/2.8 at full power, walk your flashes in some along the wall behind you. Or get more light.

Oh, here's the other thing I do ASAP. Commandeer the mattress in the room and use it to protect whatever corner flash is most likely in the line of fire for the kids. Do not even ask. That's right, all your mattresses are belong to us.

If anyone asks, which is doubtful, tell them that it is for the safety of the kids. This, they cannot argue with. No need to mention that you are simply trying to make sure the little dealers of death do not screw up your speedlights.


Option Number Two: More Interesting

Moving up the food chain a little, I would keep one light in place and move the other to the opposite back corner. This will put your little guys in a nice, soft, ambient-balanced crossfire. This could look really nice, and still be relatively safe.

But it is even more important to move laterally to keep that background perpendicular as you shoot. Now you have a flash/stand and/or ceiling hot spot to watch out for. But the light will look better.


Option Number Three: Edgy

Lastly, I would move both lights to the back. This could look really cool. Yeah, I know what you are thinking: "All rim light? No, thanks..."

But remember, the light is mostly side light. And it is soft and coming from above. Most important, the ambient light is less than two stops below the flash-lit stuff. So the shadow areas will be muted but very visible.

But the caveats from the last lighting scheme are doubled, as you have potential lighting stands and ceiling hot spots creeping in from both sides. You may want to tighten up your zoom a little and shoot in close. But these shots could turn out to be far more interesting than the option other two options.

So, what would you do differently? Hit Joseph with your ideas in the original Flickr thread.

And if you have environments that you are trying to decide how to light, throw up a question of your own. And pix of the area are always a bonus.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Starting Today, Full RSS Feeds

A little change of pace from the normal Sunday flashbacks for a small announcement.

Following last Saturday night's seminar in Seattle, I enjoyed a great after-hours discussion with a group of the site's readers about a wide range of topics. These sessions are always my favorite part of the seminars. Other than the big dance number at the end of each day's session, of course.

(Shhhh, don't give it away for the new folks.)

One of the topics that came up was partial vs full RSS feeds (I am currently set at partial) and we talked about the plusses and minuses therein. I remember that Eric, Ted and Duncan were particularly in favor of the full feeds. Pointed me to some good research, too. (We had some real web horsepower in this group. Aaron, from Google was there, too. That guy is scary smart.) Great conversation.

My position: Sure, as a reader I prefer full feeds. But as a publisher, well, if you can see the whole thing in your RSS reader, why visit the site? It'll kill my traffic. Which is essentially what feeds my kids.

Reader position: Trust us. We've seen your kids. They can miss a couple of meals. (No, kidding.) Their position was that it is the the right thing to do WRT readers, espcially people who aggregate blogs in feeders and then read them offline. Eric reads on the ferry into town, for instance. Besides, they said, you are more likely to turn up on the radar of the web's A-list influencers, which can potentially lead to good things. Robert Scoble doesn't do partial, they say.

So, readers win, conditionally at least. Given that traffic has been growing like crazy lately, now is as good a time as any to give it a try. I will give it two months and revisit it after looking at the numbers. If online traffic is down only moderately after that time, I'll stay with full feeds. But if traffic totally falls off a cliff, I will probably go back to partial feeds.

Let's see what happens.

If you are a feed-reader, let me know if this is really important to you. And if you are an RSS power user, I would love to know how you choose to make use of the new full feeds. I am sure many of the site's other readers would like to learn more about RSS'ing form the Teds and Duncans and Erics and Aarons and the like.

(You can subscribe to Strobist via Feedburner at any time by clicking on the link at upper right on the sidebar, or by clicking here.)

Friday, August 24, 2007

Speedlinks, Me Thinks, 8/25/07

Tell you a little secret: I love collecting these things all week. And many thanks to those of you who drop nifty little ideas in the comments, too.

This week's blue plate specials include lenscaps, music, seam carving, microstock, rasterbation and the ultimate camera toss.


• Print out your pix larger than life with Rasterbator.

• Computers can now stretch your photos -- with no stretch marks.

• Is the wonderfully ethereal music from that tres cool wedding proposal video still stuck in your head? It's Icelandic -- big surprise. The song is called, "Saeglopur," and it is from the album "Takk...," by Sigur Rós. You can get it on iTunes or at Amazon. I did.

• Meejahor.com dips a toe into the microstock waters -- and finds it very cold.

• Someone please buy Eric Claption a digital SLR, because his Leica M-8 has bested him.

• And finally, for all of you camera-tossers: Eat your hearts out.

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Readers Shoot Back: Konstantin Sutyagin

Born and trained as a product designer in Russia, photographer Konstantin Sutyagin moved to Los Angeles in 1999. There, he has worked as a graphic designer and, most recently, as a photographer. He submits his work to no fewer than seven different microstock companies.

I have mixed emotions about microstock, but to ignore it as a business model is rather like having your head stuck in the sand. Or someplace worse.

Sutyagin sells about 100 images a day via Shutterstock alone, and also supplements his photo income by referring other shooters to the agency. For example, that link above is coded with his referral info. So if you are going to sign up anyway, you can help to support Konstantin as 3 cents from each image a referred shooter sells would go to him. (That's from the company's split, not yours.)

Living in L.A., he has no shortage of friends with model potential. In a pinch, he'll even shoot himself (as in the chauffeur shot above.)

Sutyagin's photos caught my eye in the Strobist pool almost immediately. He is clearly getting past the idea of merely making good light, and has moved on to injecting a personal vision into his photography.

Case in point is this photo, which was singled out as a front page feature on iStockPhoto.com. (You can see how they used it in a screen grab here.)

Pause for a moment to consider how that must have felt to a young, Russian-born photog, to see his photo amplified like that, along with only his name and that of his adopted country next to it.

Sutyagin got the idea for the photo series when an artist/model/friend showed up with a new beard. He was amazed at how much his friend looked like the traditional depiction of Jesus.

So he planned to shoot him in a suburban neighborhood in a classic, iconic pose. The box was a found object. (NEVER underestimate the value of a found object on the scene as a creative spark. Always be ready to switch horses for a better idea.)

Fortunately, Sutyagin posted a contact sheet of the shoot, (click the pic for larger view) so you can easily watch the progression yourself. He likens the creative process for content to the one we like to use for zeroing in our light: Shoot, chimp, adjust, shoot, move, chimp, adjust, etc.

He considers each photo to have three elements: Subject, background and lighting. He prefers twilight for it's drama and ease of balancing with the light from a small flash.

He started shooting this shot with direct flash, then moved his Canon 420EX off-camera and into an umbrella. Finally he added a Vivitar 285HV for a backlight. The latter makes the photo, IMO. It not only rim lights the model's head but also backlights the robe, almost making an internally glowing look.

So many people get so excited the first time they off-camera flash into a twilight sky (granted, it is a huge improvement) that they fail to take the next step and define or separate their subject with a second light. Do yourself a favor and don't shortchange yourself by using just one light.

He moved a little to the right to include a setup shot (boy, was he shooting with me in mind, or what) to show just how simple and sparse his lighting gear really was. Not a lot of money here. Note that he is only using one umbrella and one stand, total. Gotta love those voice-activated light stands.

And speaking of the contact sheet, look how quickly Sutyagin explores different views. After the fact, I always find that I stay on one idea for too long at the expense of finding others. I have too many "sport photographer" brain cells, just motoring happily away...

But what about the final photo itself? The concept is as flexible as the execution is sharp. Sutyagin himself has been surprised at the layers that people extract from the photo.

Speaking for myself, I can see two visually aware, devout Christians looking at the photo, with one seeing it as blasphemous and the other seeing it as a telling comment on the shallowness of the ready-made quality of some modern churches. That is the beauty of the photograph, really. What you see in it says more about you than it says about the photo.

And as a stock photo, the conceptual uses for it are as varied as the people who will view it. In short, Sutyagin has shown himself to be a thinking stock photographer.

So what are his plans going forward (besides read Strobist on a daily basis, I mean?) He sees himself continuing to build his stock portfolio, shooting friends in Los Angeles. But next week he heads back to Russia for a month, where he will be shooting heavily, concentrating on portraits.

You can see more of his work on his Flickr Stream, or at his website, www.cool-photos.com. Or you can email him at info[~at~]cool-photos[~dot~]com.

Some of his stock photo libraries include these at LuckyOliver, ShutterStock and iStockPhoto.

(Seriously, take a good long look at his ShutterStock page and see how hard this man works and thinks.)

Annie does (Red)

UPDATE: Thanks to a tipster in the comments, I added a great video of some of the shoots at the bottom of the post. Bono, dude, you are an art director!

I belatedly caught the July issue of Vanity Fair in the waiting room at the dentist yesterday. The theme of the issue was the (red) campaign, which seeks to benefit people in Africa by donating a portion of (red)-designated items to various causes.

Photographer Annie Leibovitz traversed the globe with her cameras, lights and red background paper, photographing a human telegraph of world leaders and cultural icons to illustrate the chain of events that leads from, say, Bono raising awareness about an issue to the US government funding money for it.

If you think about it, that is a fairly complex idea to illustrate in a series of photos. But this is where being able travel with a background and lights can allow you to unify a series of photos shot in many different places and at different times.


This shot shows her setup for a shoot at the White House. How many people go to the diplomatic reception room at the White House and drop seamless paper? It makes sense if your story is about a theme that is bigger than the White House, or the person who happens to reside there.

This is a technique that you can use with any portable backdrop and a speedlight in an umbrella, if you think about it. In fact, you could choose to keep the various locations natural and visually unify a series of photos by using a standardized lighting setup, too.

It is all about having control. Knowing how to create and use various forms of light gives you options that an available light photographer doesn't have. And if you want to use available light, that option is always open to you. No so the reverse for the flash-wary photographer.

Looking at her setup shot, I see:

• Backdrop
• Two large light sources (she appeared to use just one in the photos)
• Diffusion material to create even bigger, double-difused light source -- she could fire the second light through it to make highly variable and/or subtle fill
• Two stools
• Posing table, covered in black velvet
• Wind machine

(And probably a gazillion assistants.)

Yeah, it's a bit of a production. But you can scale this concept down very well to speedlights. It all about the basic idea of having a unified look that is portable. Which comes down to controlling your environment and your light.

The only things many of us would not be able to cobble together pretty easily are the posing table and the wind machine. But those are actually pretty inexpensive items. You can get an adjustable posing table ($80) at Amazon. And this Stanley utility fan ($50) makes a great, portable directional wind machine. It also has two, 120v outlets.

Whether you are shooting far-flung employees for an annual report or prep athletes for a fall preview, being able to control your light and background to unify a series of photos done at different times and locations.



And did you notice that the majority of the shoots were done with a Canon DSLR?

Wow. I woulda thought medium format, at least.

___________________

Related links:

:: Vanity Fair Slideshow ::
:: (red) Campaign ::
:: Stanley utility fan ::
:: Posing Table ::

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Flashers Spotted in Florida Park


Seminar? Who needs a seminar? You Florida guys rock.

I had a great time in Seattle last weekend, but I am still sorry to have missed the Florida Strobist meet-up. They gathered in a park south of Orlando, and it looks as if they had a great time. It was the brainchild of Florida photographer Nick Haskins, who wrote about it afterwards in his blog.

What started off with mild-mannered portraits in the woods quickly degenerated evolved into a flash-lit mudfest. Cool beans.

Thanks to Nick for picking up the ball on this one. With the Flickr threads, it is easy to try to line up a bunch of locals.

Says Nick:
"Everyone had such a blast. There were some elderly gents that came out and dusted off their 30-yr-old equipment and came out to join us. They had a blast, too.

The funniest thing was the guard. He stopped everyone and had to tell them his story of how he was a photographer for 30 years. He came down and was amazed at Pocket Wizards."

(Ahem. I have some 30-year-old equipment, thank you. That does not make one elderly.)

It is great to see this stuff starting to happen, and there are proposals for several other area meet-ups already popping up in the Strobist Flicker threads. I highly encourage this type of thing. It is great fun to be with a group of people who do not think you are weird for wanting (or even owning) half a dozen Pocket Wizards.


:: Florida Meet-up Photos ::
:: Nick's TTD Pix ::
______________

(Muddy luv photo by Josh Mullenite, Herd of Strobists photo by Nicholaus Haskins.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Lightning in a Backpack

Not a speedlight, but creating speedlight portability for a 1,000 watt-second strobe is some cool thinking. Check out the Sportsshooter article that details this clever assistant-portable flash idea.

What I am thinking: Using a Vagabond battery with an Alien Bee (like the cool ring light, for instance) could be a reasonably priced alternative if you want watt-seconds and mobility.

My only concern is the idea of walking around with an AC/battery system while not being grounded. Don't think I'd walk into the water wearing that backpack.

:: Dyna-Lite in a Backpack ::

A Visually Engaging Presentation

Editor's note: Strobist is about off-camera lighting with small flashes. But it also embraces visual creativity of all kinds. And this is that, in spades.

This video has absolutely nothing to do with off-camera flash. If you don't like the occasional diversion, feel free to skip it. But I loved it.



Okay, I guess it is wedding proposal week on Strobist. First Matt and Sol, and now this.

Strobist reader (we do like to claim our stars) George Aye proposed last weekend to Sara Cantor, his girlfriend of three years. The time-lapse video he created with his still camera has already gone viral in just two days, with over 125,000 150,000 YouTube views.

Congratulations to George and Sara. George, hurry up and get all of your lighting gear before "discretionary spending" is no longer a line item on the budget.

And Sara, count on an wonderfully creative and visual family album in your future.
___________________________

UPDATE: George writes to tell me that "My Early Muir Owl" is an anagram of "Will you marry me?"

Seriously, this guy needs to open a consulting business.

Monday, August 20, 2007

Four and a Half More Days to Procrastinate

Just a reminder that the Umbrella Specular Portrait assignment is due on August 26th. There has been a lot of discussion on the Flickr thread about this one.

It's not as easy as it looks. If it helps, you'll probably have your lens scrunched right up into the edge of your umbrella when you have the angles correct.

Taking no chances is reader John M., of Paris, France, who offers this by-the-numbers effort.

(Everybody's a comedian...)

Knight Light

A few days ago a question popped up in the Strobist Flickr threads from reader Bruce Elliott, who was planning to photograph a man in a suit of armor. (The shot is to be used for publicity for a mountain climbing expedition for charity.)

The actual suit of armor is pictured here. Luckily, Bruce got a chance to see it (and snap a shot) early to help him plan. Being both specular and irregularly shaped, it presents a few challenges from a lighting standpoint. So let's step through some possible solutions a photographer might use based on how much access to gear they had. Like the candles post, this is a glimpse into the pre-thinking process that you should be employing whenever you have the opportunity.

The first thing to consider in shooting a large, specular object is that you need a light source that is either close and big, or further away and huge. So let's start off with a wallet-friendly, no-flash approach.

The sky is an excellent light source candidate. But you'll need to find a location that gives you a fairly panoramic view of the sky to use it as both a light source and the background.

My first instinct would be to shoot the knightly climber from a low angle, to get a little bit of an "epic" connotation. This would give you a clean composition, and it gels well with the idea of using the sky as both light source and background. The trick is choosing both the appropriate time of day and shooting direction to make the sky better suit your needs.

So you'd want the panoramic spot as the location, and evening for the time of day for your shot. The late afternoon - and especially the westerly twilight - will make a good light source to illuminate the armor. It's huge, softly gradient, and dependable. Quick recycle time, too.

This leaves the easterly sky as your background. It'll have nice color and a lower tonal value, both of which will make it a good backdrop. Even a cloudy day could work with this setup. So weather would not be too much of a variable. Remember, the armor is going to see everything in its reflection. So a big, sweeping light source like the westerly sky just after sunset will add subtle layers of interest to the armor.

Adding one flash to this scenario, I would grid spot it and warm it up a little. This will give you total control of nearly every tone density in the photo. Remember, your sky is gonna be reflecting off of the armor, so it'll be a tad hot. You'll fix this by dropping the exposure a little, which might render the guy's face a little dark. A tight grid spot would pull it right back up. You could then continue to drop the exposure (by moving to higher shutter speeds) to make the environment just about as moody as you wanted, without losing the guy's face.

With a little trial-and-error, you should be able to place a small gobo in the correct spot between the gridded light and the subject to kill the small light's reflection in the armor.


If you are strobing your knight, your light modifier is going to have to be something big. An umbrella will not work very well, as the convex shapes on the armor see a lot as far as reflections as concerned. I would go for a white wall (lit by a flash) to create a nice, big pool of light. I would back the flash up about 8 feet, and set the beam to the widest setting. Use the built-in ultrawide diffuser if it is so-equipped.

Now the wall is your light source, which should give a clean, form-defining specular highlight in the armor. Shooting near a white-walled corner would allow you to control the density of the background by moving you and your subject closer or further from the back wall.

This technique is similar to the headshot-in-a-corner post in Lighting 101. But your light source is actually the reflecting wall, with no umbrella being used.

You would want to gobo the flash in two directions. First, between the flash and your lens, which will control your flare and allow you to back it away from the reflecting wall and place it close to the subject, just out of the frame. This will give you the largest apparent light source possible.

Also, you would want to place a small gobo in a position where it blocks the small, intense light source from creating a small hotspot on the armor.

Moving to two small flashes and still using walls, we can sort of recreate the lighting design of the sky shot mentioned earlier. You'll be bouncing one flash of of a wall to create a nice, big light source. Then you would use the second to illuminate the background. The background could be another wall. Or it could be a painted backdrop or cheap piece of muslin. This would allow you to set up near a white wall just about anywhere.

You will still want to gobo the front (and probably back) flash in the spot that will keep it from leaving a small, hot specular on the armor. Remember, you are using the reflection of the splashed wall to define form. But it is important to kill the specular of the actual flash.

Using three flashes, I would look for a white wall to be your light source, bouncing a flash off of the wall just behind the photog, on each side. The third flash could illuminate another wall, or a portable backdrop. Use the subject to hide the background flash. You would have easy control over the light levels of both the knight and the background this way.

The common thread in the techniques are finding (or creating) large light sources to create nice, easily manageable highlights in the armor. A gridded flash can be used along with any of these setups to highlight the subject's face. Which, again, would give you total control over the relative values in the photos.

Of the three, I would probably go with the twilight sky-lit version with a warmed-up grid on his face. Maybe even balance to tungsten and stick a CTO gel on the grided face light and shoot on tungsten after twilight, for mood. Even better to add another 1/4 or 1/2 CTO on the face light to have warm against cool contrast.

If you have an lighting idea you are considering or an assignment that has you stumped, drop your questions and/or concerns into the Flickr discussion group threads. You'll find lots of people ready help with ideas and lighting techniques.

Adcock Double Books Wedding wih Hurricane

They say a little rain on your wedding day is good luck. But a hurricane? Eh, not so much.

Matt Adcock, who writes the killer wedding photography/lighting blog, Flash Flavor, shot and ran as the entire wedding party high-tailed it out of the direct path of Hurricane Dean.

Everybody's fine (the couple actually found another place and got hitched) and Matt has posted an account with lotsa pix here.

Speaking of his blog, there is a neat little write-up detailing the making of the shot at left, which was lit with just one SB-800. Cool photo, with great spur-of-the-moment thinking by the photog.

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Sleepless in Seattle

Man, am I whupped. But what a great weekend.

Highlights: Both seminars, the after-hours conversations, meeting lots of new friends, the white-knuckled ride in Chase Jarvis' 911. (And noting the fridge full of Red Bull at his office.)

Lowlights: The simultaneous alarm clock/cell phone alarm/wake-up call to ensure that I could drag butt out of bed early Saturday and Sunday mornings. Also the one-hour, stop-at-every-intersection 174 local bus ride each way to downtown Seattle. (What was I thinking?)

Longest item: Plane ride to Seattle. Or maybe Knottyy's hair.

Scariest site: What Ogalthorpe (left) saw through the umbrella on Saturday. (Today's word is "caffeine.")

I can't tell you how much fun it is to meet you guys in person on these road trips. Matching faces and conversation with the Flickr names and the site's regular commenters really enhances the enjoyment of being part of this community. It really is a diverse and interesting group of very special people.

After-discussion is available here. Please drop any lingering questions/rants/etc in the Seattle thread.

This one-city-at-a-time stuff is too slow. We ought to all meet in some reasonably priced location and have a big party or something.

BYOPW's.

(And yes, they did punk my flashes with their Pocket Wizards while I was setting up...)

Sunday Flashbacks, 8/19/2007

From August, 2006:

• Learn how to build Dean Collins' original "Tinker Tubes" light panels.

• (Who was Dean Collins, you ask?)

• Classic Dean Collins lighting technique from one of his protegés.

Friday, August 17, 2007

Saturday Speedlinks, 8/18/2007

We have two cool speedlinks on tap today.

I'll be away from the computer all day, brainwashing Seattlites (is that a word?) in person. So please be patient on the comment moderation.


• Strobist Reader Duncan Babbage has
tested the crap
out of the Gadget Infinity remotes. His finding: Performance varies widely, depending on the synching channel chosen. He's using an older model, but the same may be true for the newer versions, too.

• Photoflex (maker of various lighting modifiers) has a pretty neat selection of tutorials on their site. Of the three sections, I found the still lifes to be the most interesting. (Thanks to Chris H. for the heads-up.)

Grab This While You Can: PhotoShelter "Town Hall" Series

PhotoShelter has just announced a series of "Photography 2.0" town hall meetings. These look to be a very interesting -- and free -- way to spend an afternoon learning about the industry and the whole 2.0 web marketing thing for photographers.

Lotsa high-horsepower speakers from all sides -- photogs, buyers, software types, etc. There is also a round-table discussion, which will almost certainly happen at a rectangular table. Social hour aferwards, too.

There is a list posted of September dates in various US cities. If you want to snag a seat, I would sign up ASAP. They kick it off in NYC with some guy named Chase Jarvis as the main speaker.

And yes, I made sure I had my seat for that session before I told you about it.

More info here.

Yo, Two Tickets - Front Row

Just a quick heads-up that Seattle Sunday attendee Jerry Jackson had to change plans and has two seats available. First come, first served. Contact him directly here.

Friday Night Seattle Mixer

Just a quick reminder that I'll be in the bar/lobby area of the Hilton Seattle Airport tonight (Friday) if you'd like to drop by and chat in advance of this weekend's seminars. I am planning to be there between 8p and 9p.

I'll also see if I can talk Chase Jarvis into stopping by when I see him later this afternoon.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Pocket Wizards: Not Just for Flashes


YouTube filmmaker (and occasional still photographer) Chase Jarvis is at it again, this time showing his technique for remote cams that follow the action.

If you have already dropped the coin for Pocket Wizards, you may as well go the full monty and get a camera trigger cord and a Bogen Magic Arm. This will allow you to stick your camera in some really cool places, as Chase's video shows.

More info, including still pix and a list of the related gear he uses, here.

CLS/Macro Box Video

The folks over at The Imaging Resource have a neat little video tutorial that features a guy showing how he uses Nikon CLS lighting (and a commercial version of our own DIY Macro Studio) to quickly shoot objects at a consumer electronics trade show.

The lighting stuff is kind of specific to the Nikon CLS system. But what really surprised me is the way they have rigged the macro box to be able to go vertical when they have almost zero working space. You learn something new every day. And obviously, these kinds of photos are very doable using manual flash and your triggering method of choice.

This assumes their subjects have a tripod mount (they are photographing cameras.) But it is a great example of thinking outside of the box. Or at least turning the box on its side.

They also have a pretty good review explaining the CLS basics.

Imaging Resource links:

:: CLS Review Page ::
:: Macro Box CLS Video ::

Related reading, Strobist archives:

$10 DIY Macro Studio
CLS vs Pocket Wizards

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

What, Nothing on the Bottom?

I am at a loss for words. Freud comes to mind, tho.

(Thanks to Bunnymonster for the laugh.)

Headed to Seattle: Open Mic Day

I am in the air all day living on teeny tiny bags of peanuts, headed to the Seattle seminars this weekend. Which means that your pithy comments will languish unmoderated all day long, as the captain just hates it when I screw up the plane's nav system with my cellphone internet connection.

If you are coming to either of the seminars, I will see you this weekend. I would say that I will be bright-eyed and bushy-tailed when we start up at 9:00am each day, but "bushy-tailed" usually does not apply until about 10:30. I'll fake it with Diet Mountian Dew until then.

Bring your PayPal email from the purchase transaction (I have a list also though) something on which to makes notes, a camera with a wide lens (if you want to shoot the setups) and an open mind. We're gonna have fun.


Testing: 1,2,3...

Speaking of my incommunicado status all day Thursday, I want to make use of it just like when I went to London earlier this year: It's open mic time. What would you like to see more of on the site?

And before you answer, let me clue you in to some of the things that are on tap in the coming months:

First, we have readers who are doing some awesome stuff. And a person can take seeing just my own photos for only so long before feeling an itch in the roof of his mouth that only the cold steel of a gun barrel could scratch. So I am going to be making better use of the group expertise that exists within the readership of this site. There are over 100,000 of you, after all.

I will be reaching out to some of the very best shooters that submit in the Strobist Flickr stream and interviewing them on how their photos were created. Setup shots, process shots, diagrams, how-to notes - whatever we can get together. I want to refocus the very best this group has to offer back towards the entire readership.

As a group, you all can shoot me into the ground. And it is nuts to let that resource go unused. There are so many photos that I want to know more about.

Second, I will be reaching out to some of the very best lighting photographers in the world to interview them about the craft. Techniques, tricks, motivation -- everything. I have many people in mind, but I would love to hear who you particularly admire. Hit me with some URL's in the comments.

Third, I am working on several FAQ's which will hopefully answer some of the questions I am repeatedly asked. (And you might be surprised at what some of them are.)

And finally, I want to introduce you to some of the people who you are specifically benefitting by your reading this blog, and/or attending a seminar. They are doing some cool things -- in some far away places -- as a direct result of this little Web 2.0 experiment we have going on.

So, without being swayed by the moderated comments of anyone else, give us all a shout-out with any ideas you may have in the comments section. I will moderate them Thursday night if you are interested in seeing what the crowd had to say.

I know that I am looking forward to reading your suggestions.

(SWA 737 Belly by Strobist reader Wirehead.)

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Night, Science and Magic


What is This Man Doing?

We last spoke of Florida-based photographer John Moran in September of last year in a post one how he used a little gear and a lot of brains to shoot a beautifully lit photo of the Comet Hale Bopp.

John was a mentor of mine while I was in school at the University of Florida, and he has since left the PJ biz to photograph the natural beauty of Florida. Well, he's back, with an amazing shot that only a lighting wonk like yourself can truly appreciate.

Sorry to be so stark in my description of you, but if you are reading this site...

So, let's look at his setup:

• Stobe on a boom, for water sparkles: Check.
• Gazillion candlepower continuous light, for scene painting: Check.
• Custom-made black box to emulate the blinking of an amorous female firefly... Wait, what?

Before I send you to John's page on the making of this photo to see what he got, a few things to consider.

First, John's perspective is that of a naturalist photographer, chronicling the raw beauty of Florida's diverse ecosystem. So you are not gonna get a "how-to" on making an extraordinarily technical photo. You'll get a glimpse of one man's passionate approach to photographing a river. Which is cool.

That said, behind the the granola-eating, treehugger exterior lies a thinking photographer who will stop at nothing to deploy whatever light is needed to make a photo. And he told me that even with the lighting he used, there was a fair amount of layer blending in Photoshop needed to compress this scene into the range of a photograph.

And finally, he purposefully chose not to publish the photo displayed on the top of this page on his own site. He did not want a behind-the-scenes setup shot to break the spell of a magical photograph.

But he knew I would get a kick out of it. And I thought you would, too.

Scroll down to the bottom of this page to see what he got.

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More