Tuesday, January 1, 2008

They Don't Call 'em Speedlights for Nothing...


Robert Benson, whom you may remember as having shot the SPOY 2nd Place photo of a woman on a beach serving a volleyball, today shows us his extreme range with this man serving a volleyball inside a gym. This multiple-exposure shot of a volleyball serve presents lots of problems to solve. But that's what makes it fun.

Robert eschews his big lights for this shot because (ahem) they were not fast enough. More on that, and how a couple of rim lights can gussy up some on-camera flash, after the jump.
__________________


When doing a multi-exposure shot like this, you can go about it a couple of ways. First, a moving subject can be shot in a dark environment using an open shutter and multiple pops from the flash. The background has to remain dark, even with the strobes, or it will paint through other pops of the subject when it is at a different location. Side/rim lighting helps to define the subject against the dark backdrop in a nice, 3-D way.

The other method, which Robert used, is to shoot it on a series of different frames and strip elements from multiple sequences together in Photoshop. (You could also shoot a wider shot in any environment, locked down on a tripod, and clone the various versions of the moving subject into one "environment" frame.)

The use of off-camera flash in general, and speedlights in particular, solved a lot of problems for Robert. First, the light gave him a consistent, sharp-edged quality. Second, his back/rim lighting scheme gave him nice separation from the background. And the 9-frames-per-second speed was where the speedlights came into play.

If you want to have a bigger version of the shot up in another window as Robert walks you through the how-to, click here.


Robert explains:

Making this image was a little bit challenging. I've seen composites like this before. They were shot outdoors in bright light. The photographer motored through a particular sequence then stitched the photos together in Photoshop later. I did some of that, but the majority of this image was created in camera.

I wanted this to have more of a studio feel, and wanted to light it. I first thought about using some of my White Lighting strobes. But the problem was that even with strobes set at their lowest power, there was no way they would fire at nine frames per second, the speed on continuous high with my Canon Mark IIn.

Continuous light wasn't an option, because I wanted the motion-freezing light that flash gives. I also wanted background to remain dark, so subject would stand out.

So I tried Canon speedlights. I tested to see if one in master mode would make two other canon flashes in slave mode fire at nine frames a second. But even when set to their lowest power, they didn't keep up with 9 FPS.

So next I tried my Bogen radio slaves, but those didn't trip my lights every time in the 9FPS mode, either. They fired only at about four frames per second. So my only option, short of hard wiring the lights, were to use optical slaves, which were made by Wein and fit on the hotshoes of the flash. With one 530ex on the camera, it would trip the other two lights (one behind subject and one in front) at a rate of 9 frames per second!

But the flashes had to have very fresh batteries and be at their lowest setting (or almost the lowest setting) in order to keep up at that rate. The strobes were both on manual, at about 1/32 or 1/64th power -- not sure. They were about 6 feet in front of him and 6 feet behind (approximately). The camera was set at about 800, because speedlights were set so low.

Since they weren't putting out a lot of light, that meant the gym had to be nearly pitch black. (There was only a bit of light coming in through a cracked door.)

With camera on a tripod, I had him do his serve again and again as I motored through the sequence, flashes firing in unison as I shot, illuminating him with light.

Over the course of his two- to three-second serve the camera fired continuously, giving me all the different "phases" of his serve. In Photoshop I took the first frame (where he is at start of serve at the right of frame), then stitched in
the sequential shots of him only, into that first frame.

As I originally wrote, minimal Photoshop was used. The lesson I learned was that the only way to get multiple handhled strobes to fire rapidly in synch with the camera is to hardwire them or use Wein optical slaves (or equivalent).

______________________


Reading Robert's shoot notes, a few things jump out at me:

1. This guy has access to the bigger lights, but they could not do what the speedlights could: Fire at an insanely fast cycle.

2. The ISO 800 thing: I do that a lot, too, to milk an extra stop or two out of my flashes. Well lit stuff at ISO 800 looks better than crappily lit stuff at ISO 400.

3. Looking at his photo, the main light is on camera. But the server still pops from those side/rim flashes at camera left and right. Direct flash does not look bad because of where it comes from. It looks bad because it gives no three-dimensional form to the subject. In conjunction with off-camera light, on-camera flash can be part of an effective lighting scheme. Call me crazy, but I kinda like the way the rim lights define the server against that ordinarily crappy direct flash wall shadow.


Thanks for the shoot notes, Robert. They illustrate very good problem solving, and the final result rocks. Check out the photo's Flickr page, here.

New Year's Day Notes

Okeydokey, 2007 is in the books. Now it's time to hit the ground running for 2008.

Thanks to reader Bill M. for the (completely fake) Strobist Magazine mock-up he posted today. Click through on it to read all of the fun blurbs.

The big news for today is the new battery rules go into effect for flying. Of special interest to us, new rules apply to lithium-based batteries only. The nickel-metal hydride (Ni-MH) batts we love for flashes are not affected. So no worries in that regard.

Chase "Pack Man" Jarvis has info on how the new rules apply to camera and laptop batts, in his blog. And Steven "Flying with Fish" Frischling is all over it, here, here and here, among other places. Fish says he will be carefully monitoring the experiences of the shooters flying back from covering bowl games this week.

What else? Oh, yeah. Resolutions, after the jump.
______________________


1. Eat better, exercise more some. Yada, yada, yada...

2. Take a more systematic approach to the 800+ posts on the site by creating a resource page with links to significant pieces and sections, with integrated Google site search. Also, create a series of resource pages for major themes and terms, to make it easier for newbs to learn as they go.

3. Create posts (and longer articles) with more of an eye towards being a long-term information source than running a quick-hit, everyday blog. This will build the usefulness of the site for far more people, and create more usefulness over the longer term.

4. Apropos to number two, take some days off from writing and do more shooting. I am mulling over a list of project ideas right now, and am itching to get to it. All with an eye toward doing more On Assignments, of course.

5. Have fun. Always a biggie.

6. Most important, spend lots of quality time with family and friends, including hitting the road en route to some interesting places and meeting as many of you guys as possible. I love to travel, and this year looks to be full of fun trips.


Happy New Year, all.

Strobist Photos of the Year, 2007 -- 1st Place Winner

I happened upon the 2007 First Place SPOY Winner moments after it dropped into the Strobist Flickr Pool. My first thoughts were that the lighting was some of the most elegant I had ever seen. But clearly, it was one of those photos done with big flahes, using gobs of watt-seconds shot through giant silks in a huge studio.

When I learned that the entire thing was lit with two, bare speedlights, I was floored. So, too, were many of you according to your comments:

__________

"Beautiful. I would have thought for sure that there were more lights involved if I hadn't read your description and tried to picture it in my head."

"No stands? No umbrellas? Not much hardware of any kind? That's some BRAINS, that's what that is."

"Beautifully simplistic method to a VERY sophisticated result."

"... awesomelicious!"

"... uberamazing."

"This is so rad it hurts."

__________


(See the 1st-place winner and judges' comments after the jump.)
_________________________


First Place: 300SL, By Ken Brown


First place goes to California-based photographer Ken Brown, for his stunning shot of a classic Mercedes 300SL.







It's an amazing shot. The lighting is built around the idea that two bare speedlights placed on the front seats, pointing up, illuminate the interior and the undersides of the gull-wing doors. The doors are then reflected everywhere to define the edges of the body of the car. You can see the entire lighting setup here.

And lest you think we were the only ones who liked Ken's photo, American Photo did, too. You can also see a video of Ken's "walk-and-pop" speedlight-in-a-soft-box lighting technique, here.
______________________



Chase Said:
I dig on this for several reasons.

First, for it's innovation and vision - deciding how to shoot this, perspective, concept, etc. This shot will be relevant forever, and for a variety of reasons -- photographically, visually, historically. Very solid.

Second, for it's execution -  technically it's very sound.

Third--and arguably most importantly--it has that indescribable special sauce. Survey a hundred people flipping thru a magazine or clicking across thumbnails, large or small, and I'm banking that nearly everyone will pause to look at this shot. For a myriad of reasons--known or unknown to each viewer--people WILL pause and examine this image. I guarantee it.

And that, my friends, is one thing that all good pictures should seek to achieve.


I Say:

I think my initial reaction to seeing this photo was to want to show it to everyone in the room, which is about the best thing I can say about a photo. The very idea that a car could be so beautifully lit with two, bare speedlights pushes the boundaries of what is possible with small-flash lighting techniques.

I was already familiar with the idea that lighting a highly specular object was really an exercise in lighting its surroundings.

But this is a fantastic example of a thinking photographer doing more with less.

_____________________

Congratulations, Ken, on the photo. If you would be so kind as to choose your favorite prize from the list below and stick it into a comment on your photo's Flickr page, it will greatly help to speed the process of distributing prizes to the five winners after they have been announced.


Thanks again to the following sponsors for contributing such great prizes:


• An AlienBees ABR800 Ringflash, courtesy AlienBees.

• A pair of Pocket Wizard Plus II's courtesy the MAC Group, facilitated by Midwest Photo Exchange.

Elinchrom D-Lite 2 Kit, courtesy Elinchrom and facilitated by The Flash Centre.

• Two Nikon SB-800 Speedlights, courtesy Nikon USA.

• A Canon Powershot G9 Digital Camera, courtesy Canon USA, facilitated by Midwest Photo Exchange.

_____________________


Discussion, including details on the judging process and the honorable mention (6-10) photos, here.

Monday, December 31, 2007

5th-Place SPOY Winner, Via Peoples' Choice Vote

Congratulations to Ryan Taylor, for his stunning night shot of a wake boarder. Ryan used another person (out of the frame, at camera left) being pulled in an inner tube, to position a Nikon SB-800 in a protective bag.

The result was a dramatically lit photo which would have been impossible to duplicate with on-camera lighting.

This is just the type of innovative, small-flash thinking that pushes the envelope for everyone. And Ryan should be especially proud that of all of the winners, his alone was confirmed by the votes of his fellow readers. (Over one thousand people voted in our one-day run-off.)

The vote count was confirmed by both hand count and computer count, using two different people. (Thanks, Paul!)

Also, please join me in congratulating the other four finalists, whose photos were strong enough to ensure a very suspenseful day (with multiple lead changes) for all of us -- not the least of which, I am sure, the five remaining finalists. We will be naming the 1st-place winner later today. Now, get back to your drinking and stealing cheap, New Year's kisses.

And above all, drive, walk, or stumble safely home. If you have been tipping a bottle, use a designated driver or find a couch. I have a readership level to maintain...

Congratulations, Ryan. If you could please place in order the prizes below (and yes, it matters what order, in the event someone does not come forward to claim a prize in time) so that we may facilitate the speedy transfer of the loot.



Thanks again to the following sponsors for contributing such fantabulistic prizes:


• An AlienBees ABR800 Ringflash, courtesy AlienBees.

• A pair of Pocket Wizard Plus II's courtesy the MAC Group, facilitated by Midwest Photo Exchange.

Elinchrom D-Lite 2 Kit, courtesy Elinchrom and facilitated by The Flash Centre.

• Two Nikon SB-800 Speedlights, courtesy Nikon USA.

• A Canon Powershot G9 Digital Camera, courtesy Canon USA, facilitated by Midwest Photo Exchange.

_____________________


Discussion, including details on the judging process and the honorable mention (6-10) photos, here.

Sunday, December 30, 2007

SPOY 5th Place: You Be The Judge

The very cool 3rd-place "Ants at the Trough" photo, by Peter Steeper, showed a 2007 date in the Flickr system, but was in fact taken in 2003. This being the 2007 Strobist Photos of the Year, Peter and I mutually agreed to remove it from consideration after the fact.

Given that the contest was for photos taken in 2007, we both felt it the fairest course of action. Mind you, it's still a kick-butt photo, and Peter should be very proud of it. Other arrangements are being made in thanks for Peter's gracious handling of the date confusion.

With a hole left in the top five photos, and five honorable mentions waiting at the ready, and Chase Jarvis inconveniently en route to Paris as I type this post, we are left with a decision as to what to do.

That's where you come in. Hit the jump for details.
_________________________


First of all, 5th place moves to 4th, and 4th moves to 3rd. Which now leaves the hole at 5th.

Problem: Where to find a judge on such short notice to determine which of the honorable mentions gets bumped up to 5th?

Solution: The 5th place slot now becomes a Peoples' Choice, from the remaining honorable mentions. They are listed below, in no particular order. (Please note the number by each photo. )

The members of the Strobist Flickr Group have all been deputized as 5th-Place, Peoples' Choice Judges. You will be choosing one, and only one. We, uh, you will vote simply by leaving a post in the thread linked below and stating the number 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5.

Please vote only once. Any instance of duplicate votes will result in none of your votes being counted. You may change your vote at any time via the edit function. If you wish to lobby, please do so in the SPOY Discussion Thread instead of within the voting thread. And please keep your lobbying to being in favor of a particular image, rather than trashing another one.

IMPORTANT: Your post in the voting thread should contain one digit: 1-5. Simply cast your vote by typing a number.

The voting closes as of the end of 2007, which is about 22 hours from now, Eastern Time US. You'll know voting is closed because we have arranged for a shiny ball to drop down in Time Square in New York City to mark the closing of the polls. Any votes cast after that time will not be counted. We are arranging to have the NYC vote-closing ceremony televised, too. Check local listings in the US.

Without further ado, here are your five honorable mentions from which to choose. You may click through from any of the photos to see the photo's Flickr page for more information.

__________________________



Number 1

















Number 2












Number 3













Number 4
















Number 5















_________________________________

I am very curious to see how smoothly this goes. If it works, it could pave the way for an all-peoples' choice 2008 SPOY. Assuming there is a 2008 SPOY.


Please vote here.


Thanks for your help!

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Strobist Photos of the Year, 2007 -- 2nd Place Winner

Three down, two to go.

For each of the previous winners, we have given comments as to why they were chosen. We'll do that after the jump, but for the final two I also want to post some of the comments of the other Flickr users left when they first came across the 2nd-place photo on its Flickr page:


"Wow. Amazing. Is this real?"

"Superb!!! How did you get the light on her legs?"

"Absolutely stunning lighting and POV."

"This is amazing! Truly original concept. I like that it looks like a fantasy painting."

"I thought about wow! but then I see so many others expressing the same sentiment. What the hell... WOW! Just WOW!"



(See the 2nd-place winner and judges' comments after the jump.)
_________________________


2nd-Place Photo: Woman Playing Volleyball at the Beach


Second place goes to California-based photographer Robert Benson, for his cross-lit shot of a woman playing volleyball on a beach.









From Robert's comments, some thoughts on the setup:

"To turn outdoor bright sunlight to a controllable dark, you first have to put camera on slowest ISO setting (50 or 100), go to your camera's fastest shutter synch speed (usually around 1/250th), and dial aperature down to around f16 or f22," he says.

"Then set up your off-camera lights. Outdoors they will have to put out enough power to light subject at that small F16 or F22, and with moving subjects, the duration of the flash should be short, to prevent motion blur."
______________________


(As most of you know, you can duplicate this technique by using a camera which allows hi-speed synching, which gives you the ability to do this with a pair of speedlights. This method also keeps the flash duration way down, which eliminates motion blur.)


Chase Said:
Nicely executed shot here.

The certain je ne sais pas (I know not what) of this image is actually that there is no je ne sais pas at all. We know it all. It's a very classic formula for making a great image and it deserves to be recognized as such. 

The formula is:

A) The timing: Peak action with some tension in the moment; 

B) The light: I'm guessing it's what I call the "sandwich" technique (strobe left, strobe right, and backlit with the sun. Also, the use of the sun to draw the viewer to the focal point and the overall underexposing of the image to amplify texture in the clouds and the sand is a wise move. And finally,
 
C) The composition: The subject position in the frame generally is pleasing; the separation from subject, ground, net, sun, and ball creates beautiful tension (and simultaneous fluidity); the camera angle adds drama and accentuates the athleticism of the subject.


I Say:

This photo is so much more than just lighting technique, which of course was well-executed. As Chase said, many factors come together to make this a very dynamic moment: The tonal gradient created by the obscured sun drawing the eye into the compositional center frame, the tension, the way the light defines the muscles, the simple (yet dynamic) composition, the timing.

On that last point, a tip for aspiring action shooters: The moment just before something happens has much better tension and timing than when the thing is actually happening. And if has just happened, you missed it. And for you portrait shooters and wedding shooters, how much more interesting the fractional second before a kiss actually happens than the kiss itself.

Finally, the icing on the cake for me on this one is the sand: Frozen, defined by the crosslight, and looking for all the world like a nebula shot from the Hubble Space Telescope.

_____________________

Congratulations, Robert, on the photo. If you would be so kind as to choose your top two prize choices, in order, from the list below and stick it into a comment on your photo's Flickr page, it will greatly help to speed the process of distributing prizes to the five winners after they have been announced.


Thanks again to the following sponsors for contributing such great prizes:


• An AlienBees ABR800 Ringflash, courtesy AlienBees.

• A pair of Pocket Wizard Plus II's courtesy the MAC Group, facilitated by Midwest Photo Exchange.

Elinchrom D-Lite 2 Kit, courtesy Elinchrom and facilitated by The Flash Centre.

• Two Nikon SB-800 Speedlights, courtesy Nikon USA.

• A Canon Powershot G9 Digital Camera, courtesy Canon USA, facilitated by Midwest Photo Exchange.

_____________________


Discussion, including details on the judging process and the honorable mention (6-10) photos, here.

Reader Question: Why Do Rim Lights Blow Out?

Reader Till Hamburg asks the above question in the Strobist Flickr Pool, and posts a series of photos just to prove his point. First of all, a little explanation of what Till means by these numbers. Then, an explanation and how to make that angle-dependent strength thing work for you.

The series of photos at left have two lights which concern us. (Looks like there is a backgrond light going on there, too. But let's ignore that for the purposes of this discussion.)

In the top photo, the rim light is set one stop hotter than the light at camera right (which is illuminating the subject's face.) In the middle, they are equal. And in the bottom, the rim light is one stop lower than the main light.

__________

PLEASE NOTE: I think he has his f/stops reversed in the label on the bottom photo. As you can see, the main light is remaining constant, while the rim light drops a stop each frame, heading toward the bottom.
__________

This lighting quirk used to screw me up all of the time when I would shoot a rim-lit situation, until I figured out what was going on.

Why it happens, and a way to make this work for you, after the jump.
____________________________


Rimshot, Please...

The first component of the higher efficiency of rim light is the physical property of the way anything reflects when it hits something at a shallow angle. I always use the analogy of light behaving like a pool ball when it comes to reflections, as in this post on how to light people wearing glasses.

So let's stretch the light-as-pool-ball analogy a little more and think in terms of retained energy. A glancing reflection off of something will use up less energy than a direct hit. So to will light glancing off of a 3-d object. It is simply a more efficient way to reflect.

Second, rim lights are more likely (than main lights) to be hard light sources. As we have learned, hard light sources create stronger specular reflections than do larger light sources. I know the specular reflection strength is a component to rim lighting being more efficient because I see the effect lessened when my rim light is soft.

So, how can you use this info?

Well, you certainly want to use your weakest light as a rim light to take advantage of the efficient rim light thing. In fact , when I am rim lighting in close, I usually start my SB-800s at 1/128 power and adjust my working aperture to where that looks good as a starting point.

As you can see above, even one stop down is a little hot for a rim light. I tend to start out at two stops down. (If you work without a flash meter, as I do, use your guide number chart to get you close on the first pop.

Also, if a room is ambient-lit in a poor, muddy-ish, ASA-800 kinda way and you only have one light, consider using that light as a separation/rim light (instead of in front) to add depth to your scene. Because of the efficiency of the lighting angle, you can back that speedlight way back (adding depth and internal separation and slow fall-off to the whole scene) even though your speedlight is not very powerful.

___________________


Related posts:

:: L101: Lighting People With Glasses ::
:: L102: Specular Highlights ::
:: Guide Numbers: Your Free Flash Meter ::

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More